Archived Hams are trying to "reclaim" the word fat to use it to empower themselves (fatpeoplehate)
submitted ago by meanmonster211
Posted by: meanmonster211
Posting time: 5.3 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 1211
SCP: 27
27 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
~31 user(s) here now
NSFW: No
Authorized: No
Anon: No
Private: No
Type: Default
Archived Hams are trying to "reclaim" the word fat to use it to empower themselves (fatpeoplehate)
submitted ago by meanmonster211
view the rest of the comments →
[–] FatJavalina ago (edited ago)
In this instance, I don't think that's fat sympathy, and here's why: something that could indiscriminately eradicate humans (weapons and human violence aside) is definitely worse than a fat. It means that many healthy, valuable humans would die as well: far more than would if we only had fats to worry about. If there was a virus that only targeted healthy people, it would be considerably worse than a fat because so many healthy would die while leaving so many fats alive and thus collapsing our species. Now, if there were a virus that only attacked excessively fatty tissue, it'd be worth so much more than fats because it would kill all of them while leaving us humans untouched.
The only reason the first two options are worse is because you value humans that much more than you do fats. If it weren't for harming humans, you absolutely would not care if a disease wiped out fats (which, in a way, is happening).
edit to add: I'd put them above illnesses and diseases that could harm the rest of us severely. They are below the vermin themselves, they are below weapons, they are below tampons and garbage until/if we find some use for them. I have knee-jerk revulsion to fats. They're sick. They're essentially diseased. If they were right with their guhnetik arguments, I would never let their genes mix with mine. As it is, I don't want their influence on my future children, so I still choose to not let them mix with me. They're set up to die in the wilderness. I'd want someone with advantage whether it's physical or mental or both. Hams absolutely lack both.
[–] SeigneurdesEtrons ago
Please don't use the second person singular in your argument. I've recently been to West Africa and have gone through Ebola-scanning.
...fats are worse. It was utterly rhetorical.
[–] FatJavalina 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I meant it as a universal you, not you specifically.