You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] Ellen_Kung_Pao 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It's interesting to say the least. I mean, not a whole lot of disabilities get the support the way this one does. Guys with ED don't get special underwear made to make them more confident or "fully-dicked." There aren't clothing lines for people with -1, -2, -3, or no limbs.

At its core, it's being done for financial gain, like almost every decision or business. People can cover it up by saying it's for support, or togetherness or inclusion, but if nobody was buying these clothes, would they be for sale? If nobody was fat enough to need them, and if over 2/3 of the US wasn't overweight, would this event happen? No.

If the US is going to go with the rest of the world with more heavily funded health care, we need to make no acceptation for pricing. Financially incentivize people via not paying for / catering to 'fat services.' For my insurance (BS of CA, 80 plus gold PPO) I checked, and if I had type 2 diabetes, my costs for tests, lab work, visits, pills, or anything pertaining to that self-inflicted disease cost me LESS!

Why? To cater to the fatties of course. Fuck em, if you choose to live that lifestyle, and don't have a VERY RARE out of control thyroid issue, fucking pony up the cash to live that way.