Posted by: lilbigd1ck
Posting time: 2.4 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 10/3/2018 10:00:00 AM
Views: 2363
SCP: 80
80 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
~31 user(s) here now
NSFW: No
Authorized: No
Anon: No
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Humansized 0 points 15 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago
People like this are why aids wont die out.
[–] DorothyMantooth 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
It's kind of infuriating when you think about it, isn't it? We could have basically fucking erased AIDS from the population in a single generation if people had just kept it in their fucking pants (and stopped sharing needles). ALL it would have taken is for people to be responsible. But no. How dare the evil government tell me to quit barebacking a string of random assholes on a Saturday night! That's shaming and phobic!
[–] DrShitlord 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
In the 80s, the epidemiologists predicted that, given the "high" promiscuity rates in the West, almost everyone will have it by 1995. 30 years later and HIV is still 80-90% restricted to male homosexuals and intravenous drug users. The rest is mostly bisexual men and risk takers plus a small number of innocent bystanders.
Let's fact check: One single intercourse with an HIV infected person carries approx. a 1% risk of transmission. The average lifetime partner count for Westerners is around 10-15. This seems to not be enough to cause a pandemic within the general heterosexual non-drug-taking population, but only in a subpopulation. Maybe someone would like to explain the difference? Maybe fucking around big time with no protective measures, maaaaybe?
But the most probable explanation in brain-damaged "progressive" 2018: it's because of discriminashun /s