You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
12

[–] Carsandsarcasm 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

You can see the same comparison anywhere you like. You can overload a person's joints by wearing weights or by carrying heaps of muscle or by carrying to much hiking gear in exactly the same way as you can overload, for example, a car's suspension by overfilling it to move house, driving aggressively on a race track, or by transporting the hamplanet that made this post. In every example you choose, however, the overload serves a constructive purpose (except transporting a fat) and you could think of a million similar comparisons. I don't know how dumb you have to be to not understand the concept of a necessary evil. THE WHOLE POINT of fat hate is that you are burdening yourself unnecessarily. If there was any constructive purpose, use, or point to being fat, nobody would care anywhere near as much.

It is unbelievable that we are trying to argue with people that lack such a fundamental understanding of the problem.

0
4

[–] Scooter_Death 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Unnecessarily burdening yourself AND others. If I were running a business, I would much rather hire and make accommodations for the pregnant woman rather than the fat woman.

The pregnant woman is bringing a new life into the world, and the fatty’s argument that the unborn child could grow up to become the next Hitler is spurious at best. What are the chances of that? So infinitesimal that calculating them is a waste of time. What are the butterbeast’s chances of becoming a drain and a burden on both the company and society at large? Close to 100 percent.

0
5

[–] Carsandsarcasm 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Don't you love the logic, though? It's a choice between literally Hitler or me losing weight. This makes sense in their brain.