Posted by: BrawBrichtNicht
Posting time: 3.2 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 12/26/2017 10:00:00 AM
Views: 1819
SCP: 36
36 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
~31 user(s) here now
NSFW: No
Authorized: No
Anon: No
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] different_to_a_duck 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
So if fatties blame water retention for their weight, wouldn't that mean it's even easier to lose a certain amount of weight, if 1/3 of it is water?
100g of fat have 900 calories, but if 30g of those 100g are just water, that only leaves 630 calories to be burned.
Or am I missing something here?
[–] fabulousalpaca 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
If you have water retention cause your diet is shitty it's a matter of just fixing your diet.. However, we know fats would never do that. Thus, they don't lose the water weight.
[–] Naught405 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
It is very easy to lose water weight, by drinking enough water and not over consuming salt and sugar your kidneys can maintain a proper water balance. In the course of a couple days you can get your water balance back to normal. Just a note 1:3 ratio means 4 parts total or 25% water by weight. It's also the extreme, but on a diet high in sugary drinks and salt and low in pure water it can be reached.
To answer your question, yes it does appear as part of their body fat in normal tests, and yes they can get rid of easily just by consuming human ratios and amounts of salt, sugar and water.
As far as food/nutrition goes, no, in order to do the testing they first desiccate and later burn the food to determine how much of it is none calorie containing water and ash. The reason your serving may say 100g and only 50g of macros is because the rest isn't use-able as calories, that includes water.