Posted by: Ana-banana
Posting time: 3.5 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 9/2/2017 10:00:00 AM
Views: 1570
SCP: 19
19 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
~31 user(s) here now
NSFW: No
Authorized: No
Anon: No
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] PiggerTrigger 0 points 11 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago
That's because they aren't a thing, and you aren't a retard.
To many fats, negative calories are a thing. They are food you eat that (magically) burn more calories than they contain, allowing you to eat as much as you want and lose weight, or creating a deficit so you can eat other food.
Of course, they also hold that CICO doesn't work.
Logic, reason, consistency... other things you probably have because you aren't a retarded fat.
[–] Squarshed 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
I always love the weird trains of thought they follow to perform their mental gymnastics.
"I am drinking coffee. Coffee increases my heart rate. Increased heart rate = burning calories! I can afford a little cream and sugar because I'm burning the calories by drinking my coffee! TEEHEE! chugalug"
[–] FatPeopleJelly 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Don't forget that iceberg lettuce takes more energy to digest than it has in it! Probably like, 50-100 calories, maybe more!
[–] Trogdor300 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I have heard that about iceberg lettuce but then again you don't see fats eating plain iceberg lettuce all day.
[–] 9395203? ago
There are some "negative calories" foods which supposedly take more calories to digest than they provide, but it's not an amount worth talking about.