[–] Redkraken 0 points 77 points (+77|-0) ago 

6X vs 2X? Makes slightly more sense. Or maybe it was 6 dresses sewn together vs 2.

[–] m3talpetals 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

It's the only logical explanation.

[–] lilbigd1ck 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Except then the second photo should show like 5. She doesn't look much smaller

[–] Buggsie_Blue 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Torrid sizes.

[–] fabulousalpaca 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

That's what I was thinking.. Though that 2X still looks heavily vanity sized.

[–] Sveenee 0 points 41 points (+41|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Torrid is an American clothing store for hamplanets to shop. Here's a size chart;


Yes, its bullshit but it explains it. A size 2 with this company equals a size 18 anywhere else.

[–] picklesforever 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Yeah but she's still way bigger than an 18.

If she were truly proud of her weightloss she'd give her weight and not an arbitrary size that she could easily make up.

[–] HippyHoney 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Torrid's sizing is extremely vanity sized on top of that, so a size 2 = 18 = 20 there.

[–] Sylph 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

yep. I'd put her at a 24/26 easily in the second photo.

[–] ForgotMyName 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

So I was close in my guess that they just left off the zeroes. Size 60 / size 20.

[–] squirrelette 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Well, I'm glad that they don't size under 00, I hate to think of how many zeros they would have to print on human clothes.

[–] cultural_dissenter 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Wow. That's the only brand I've ever seen where I would be a double zero.

[–] no_step_on_snek 0 points 25 points (+25|-0) ago 

I think the 6 and 2 refers to how many actual pigs could fit into the dress.

[–] Bigtop 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

Maybe the Amy Schumer school of body measurement.

[–] Sylph 2 points 16 points (+18|-2) ago 

oh for fucks sake how stupid do they think people are? 22 maybe. I'M a fucking 2. and i could fit my whole body in her pant leg.

[–] hamplanetarium1 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Makes sense, maybe she meant size 2:

2 humans.

[–] Pepper-theDoctor 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Two monstrous humans

[–] Carsandsarcasm 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Are humans into negative sizes yet? If this is a two, we must be -18.

[–] Lurkerontheroof 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

You know, at this point I wouldn't even bat an eye if I see negative sizes next time I'm clothes shopping.

[–] l23r 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

cause you aren't a reeeeeeeeel whoamen

[–] Shitcountess 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Me neither. Just waiting for the EU directive/law where they forbid being a negative size person.

[–] Titanbikes4ever 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

the fats started doing a 2 for 2x, it's stupid and not fooling anyone, but they still do it

[–] hamplanetarium1 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Size two? Two what? Two tons?

Ham must not be using the family brain cell and assume everyone is as fucktarded as she is. Well we aren't porker. Quit sharing pictures of your malformed sausage legs, you Beetus riddled pig.

[–] Runway22L 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Hey that's not fair! She went to a lot of trouble too sandwich those hooves into high heals just so she'd look nice for YOU! :P

[–] hamplanetarium1 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

The only way that hog would look nice is in a coffin. Of course it would have to be a very big coffin. Maybe a piano box. Or a container for shipping goods.

One of these should suffice.


load more comments ▼ (30 remaining)