You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
3

[–] AzazelForPresident 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Jokes on you, robots don't yet have the functionality to know what signing a marriage contract means!

The line is consent as far as Im concerned. Dogs and toasters can't consent, two adults can. Bitch has a mental disorder.

0
5

[–] thefisherman1961 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Robots should never have rights, they need to be treated like slaves. They are not sentient entities, nor will they ever be, so we have no moral obligation to treat them any differently than the hunks of metal they are

0
2

[–] elfupacabra 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

True but I don't think Hams should be classified as human. They can feel free to marry any animal/object they want.

0
2

[–] mmmmdonuts 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Aww that's not nice.

0
1

[–] FatWombat 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

They might be persons at some point though. Don't forget that "you" is an emerging property of a largish meatbag.

0
1

[–] antiracistNew 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

They are not sentient entities, nor will they ever be

You don't know that.