You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
-1

[–] dontdoxxmebro [S] 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

You are right, that statement is rhetoric. I am not looking to, at all, alter your opinion; should you choose to politically sympathize with the beasts, that is all up to you. He is fucking obese, and Hillary is more than likely very overweight, if not obese. Fat fucks for president 2016 http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/03/06/article-1159941-03BEEA1B000005DC-438_468x635.jpg

0
3

[–] MrSaxoBeetus 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I don't even vote in the US, so I didn't bother with siding with any of them. I think the American people should decide whatever they think it's best for them. I feel sad that some of them even care about Syria or Israel, when the US already have huge internal issues to be solved (for instance, the obesity epidemics).

I dislike Hillary Doublechinton as strongly as I dislike Trump. I don't believe any of them is suited to become a president. I'd probably vote on that guy who doesn't know what Aleppo is. I just don't agree with the histrionics in this election. Enforcing drug tests for presidential candidates is, in my opinion, a rational, doable action. I don't think he's a better candidate because of it. It doesn't change the judgement I passed on him.

0
2

[–] dontdoxxmebro [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Alright, that is about the most reasonable thing I have read on Voat regarding politics, thanks. I really wish the US would give up on drug testing, it works about as well as gun control; I suppose that is a matter for another day.