You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] Arlaeflores 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I like Abercrombie and Fitch for pants, I also think we should measure pants in waist measurements

0
0

[–] ShitLordLA [S] ago 

Mens pants are measured in waist measurements. But even that has been skewed by vanity sizing...but more subtly.

It used to be that pants were meant to sit at the true waist..which is above the hip bones slightly lower than the bellybutton. Now people wear their pants much lower, which on men tends to be a smaller area (even for the gorgebeasts) than the true waist. So if you have a 38" true waist you might have a 35" "pant size" because of this sly vanity sizing.