H.R.1911 - Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism Act of 2018

Summary for you lazy faggots | Shown Here

Introduced in House (04/05/2017) Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism Act of 2017

This bill amends the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to provide that the Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism shall have the rank of ambassador and be appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

The Special Envoy shall: (1) be a person of recognized distinction in the field of combating anti-Semitism or religious freedom; (2) serve as the primary advisor to, and coordinate efforts across, the U.S. government relating to monitoring and combating anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic incitement in foreign countries; and (3) report directly to the Secretary of State.

Goats, this bill already passed the congressional vote with overwhelming support and is going to the Senate then TRUMP, then law. While you all have your panties in a bunch from the wave of the Q believers, let's not let them sneak this past us.

If this law passes, nearly every American goat on this site, is going to be prosecuted under federal law from even half the shit we say. Naming the Jew will be illegal. This is the very definition of what the right to free speech brings, the right to name the jew, the black, the white, the whatever the fuck you want to name. It clearly states, Trump will name the individual who will serve as the Judge/Jury/Executioner. He has sent more money than any American President to Israel to continue their reign of terror. He will take away our right to free speech, now is not the time to wait.

This is your right as a human but in law, it's the right of EVERY AMERICAN to say what the fuck you want to say and to whom. They will make it illegal for SPEAKING. think about this, fuck all this media bullshit, this is the real fucking news.

Stop being distracted by riddles, stop being angry at the immigrants and for fucks sake, let's all band together to protect the first thing that makes America truly great.

We know that Africans were treated far better than Irish slaves (and were worth 10x more). Are we to believe that somehow there was outsized and rampant abuse of African slave 'property' as opposed to Irish? And what were the Irish slaves? Just ordinary people going about their business, swept up onto slave ships? Or were they criminals?

And what if the African slaves were actually the unwanted Africans (criminals, political dissidents, etc) like the 161,000 criminals and political dissidents sent to Australia from the UK? Then they would have been sent to North and South America as prisoners, wouldn't they?

Are we to believe that ordinary Irish became slaves and the criminals in Ireland didn't, and were free to become a burden to Ireland? Can we apply the same logic to African slaves?

What if Britain exported its criminals to Australia (1788-1868) because it worked when they exported Irish criminals to the Americas (from 1500)? And what if the same merchants that bought Irish criminals negotiated the same deal with African tribes to supply labor to the new world?

Between 1500 and 1600, Africa's population grew by 32%. By 1700 there were 106 million Africans (compared with 2M total people in North America). During the approximate 400 years of the African slave trade, between 600M-1B Africans were born. Supposedly about 12 million slaves were exported from Africa to the new world, with most being sent to South America. This is about 2%

Is it unreasonable to assume that Africa had criminals making up 2% of its population, and the leaders of tribes would want to get rid of them or exchange them for something of actual value? "Give me your criminals in exchange for gold/silver"

What leader wouldn't take that deal? They'd probably want them also to take their families, too, because they would have been a burden to society.

If so, would these criminals be allowed to roam free in the new land? Probably not. They would be chained on the ships and chained when they got off. They may also have committed more crimes in the new land, leading to punishment or even death for repeat offenders.

Should we assume that most accounts and photos of slaves being punished or killed were of slaves who did nothing wrong?

Was the Republican Party established in response to slavery not only because it believed all men should be free, but that the offspring of criminals should not be born into slavery? Would there be any political gain for the democratic party to leave out these important aspects? Are there any other ways the democratic party tries to make it seem like the republicans wanted and kept slaves, and did all kinds of horrible things to them? The narrative would be something like "Hey, blacks should always vote democrat because republicans did horrible things to blacks in the past. Here is the proof?"

tl;dr Slaves were unwanted criminals in their own lands, eventually exploited for political gain by the democratic party

I can't believe how people interested in conspiracies are still posting on Reddit. These morons want to discuss conspiracies while posting on an obvious kike honeypot. Fucking amateurs.

If people didn't get the 9/11, it's obvious that people are demented sheeple. It looks obvious that the the 9/11 was a psychological experiment by the elite to check how intelligent the masses are. Right after the 9/11, the elite have started the faggots / transgended bullshit. Nothing is a coincidence, everything weird that happens has a meaningful basis. It's the judeo-satanists trying to understand if it's possible to get back society in pre-christian times.