0
1

[–] Kromulent 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

A pocket revolver can be a fine choice, but Taurus has a terrible quality-control reputation and I would advise a used S&W or Ruger instead.

There are smaller, lighter, flatter .380 pistols, like the Ruger LCP and the KelTec 3AT that offer essentially the same firepower in a much easier to carry package. Cheaper, too.

0
1

[–] jsac 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

revolvers arent the best for pockets imo.. i have a .38 +P airweight... the cylinder on it makes me feel like i was carrying a softball in my pocket.. went to a .380 bodyguard and never looked back.

0
1

[–] iloveguns 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

IMHO spend a little more and get a S&E J-frame.

0
0

[–] con77 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

anythings better than not being armed

0
0

[–] edistojim 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I have a small Ruger and a Kimber Blue Sapphire that I occasionally carry while dressed better than just casually. My everyday is a combat commander in .45. They seem to be reliable guns for cheap plastic, can't hit much with it but on the other hand I'm probably not gonna use it unless I'm very close. The Kimber is in a whole different class, its bulletproof defense with never a FTF/FTE. Both are in .380. I'm pretty much a "run what you brung" kind of guy, it you shoot it fairly well, practice and know its limitations you'll do fine. I try to remember that a .22 if used correctly will quickly make you seek medical attention.

I know this is about revolvers but I thought I'd throw it out.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] 10658244 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

?!? That is wrong on at least three levels

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]