You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
All posts containing NSFW content (nudity, violence, or gore) must be tagged as such via the "toggle nsfw" option, and all comments containing NSFW content must be designated as such by having a description of the content or "NSFW" label in the comment.
Violations of this rule will result in a formal warning. Three warnings within a period of seven days will result in a permanent ban.
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
[–]M4rt1n0 points
1 point
1 point
(+1|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
Fuck I have never heard that term. But I am drinking Vodka and here to lay out the truth.
Nature Vs. Nurture is a real argument for any organism with a will. Dogs, Pigs, Humans, Horses, these are domesticated creatures which still have will, which I will use as an example. I am not excluding Ocean based Mammals in principal, only I don't have enough data on them to include them in my assertions.
Pt.1 - "Breeds" of Dogs cross boundaries of genetic variance which are not symmetric with variant codings in Homo-Sapien.
-WTF DiD You Just Say To Me?
The difference between any "Breed" of dog is much smaller than the variance between Europeans and Africans, yet there are no scientific "breed" designation for humans.
So What
It is useful to learn about genetic differences between humans for the same reason it is useful to learn the difference in behaviors between breeds.
But Dats Raycis
You can see in my post that I make no judgments about which "breeds" or "races" are better or worse, only that there is a difference, which is measured, and which is more importantly measured in two different "languages" in science pretending that Homo Sapien is not mostly, still, an animal.
The Taxonomy of Homo-Sapien is broken due to Narcissism and denial. We are animal, we are the "Top" of the food chain that "We" have the ability to perceive, but that does not mean Race != Breed.
I will close with a well worn quote;
I'm not racist.
Why be racist?
There are so many perfectly good reasons to hate people
On an individual basis.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] M4rt1n 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Fuck I have never heard that term. But I am drinking Vodka and here to lay out the truth.
Nature Vs. Nurture is a real argument for any organism with a will. Dogs, Pigs, Humans, Horses, these are domesticated creatures which still have will, which I will use as an example. I am not excluding Ocean based Mammals in principal, only I don't have enough data on them to include them in my assertions.
Pt.1 - "Breeds" of Dogs cross boundaries of genetic variance which are not symmetric with variant codings in Homo-Sapien.
-WTF DiD You Just Say To Me?
The difference between any "Breed" of dog is much smaller than the variance between Europeans and Africans, yet there are no scientific "breed" designation for humans.
So What
It is useful to learn about genetic differences between humans for the same reason it is useful to learn the difference in behaviors between breeds.
But Dats Raycis
You can see in my post that I make no judgments about which "breeds" or "races" are better or worse, only that there is a difference, which is measured, and which is more importantly measured in two different "languages" in science pretending that Homo Sapien is not mostly, still, an animal.
The Taxonomy of Homo-Sapien is broken due to Narcissism and denial. We are animal, we are the "Top" of the food chain that "We" have the ability to perceive, but that does not mean Race != Breed.
I will close with a well worn quote;