You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] forgotpasswordagain ago 

This argument assumes far too much, and gives no justification for the founding premises. No terms are defined, thereby requiring the reader to come up with their own determination of what is meant by vague terms as "God", "necessary things", "things necessarily coexisting with God", "goodness", and "evil".

There are so many ways to attempt to make sense of this argument, but without any explanations for how the premises came about, I can't go along with any conclusions drawn therefrom.