Archived This is what Richard Dawkins is up against. Heads he loses, and tails he loses. (voat.co)
submitted ago by [deleted]
Posted by: [deleted]
Posting time: 5.4 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 118
SCP: 12
13 upvotes, 1 downvotes (93% upvoted it)
Archived This is what Richard Dawkins is up against. Heads he loses, and tails he loses. (voat.co)
submitted ago by [deleted]
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Absolem 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
So... what's the end game here?
The people who are supposedly responsible, in the view of these "social justice" people, aren't allowed to help. They should "stay in their lane"? In other words just mind your own business? So... do these people actually want solutions? Or do they just want to ensure there's enough things to drum up outrage about to keep the ad revenue on their blogs and online tabloid rags up?
Edit: Sorry also kind of responding to the article Dawkins was referencing, in addition to the tweets. Here's an internetarchive link instead.
https://web.archive.org/web/20150728063357/http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/07/25/richard-dawkins-fails-spectacularly-on-feminism-and-islam/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=socialnetwork
[–] dahlia ago (edited ago)
Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner!
Jokes aside, there's a big problem with people creating a group identifier as belonging to an oppressed minority, and will do everything to stay with the in-group.