Archived Weighing up the evidence for the 'Historical Jesus' (theconversation.com)
submitted ago by Chimaira92
Posted by: Chimaira92
Posting time: 2.6 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 7/31/2018 10:00:00 AM
Views: 241
SCP: -6
3 upvotes, 9 downvotes (25% upvoted it)
Archived Weighing up the evidence for the 'Historical Jesus' (theconversation.com)
submitted ago by Chimaira92
Sort: Top
[–] [deleted] 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
[–] Chimaira92 [S] 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
Little can be gleaned from the few non-Biblical and non-Christian sources, with only Roman scholar Josephus and historian Tacitus having any reasonable claim to be writing about Jesus within 100 years of his life.
And even those sparse accounts are shrouded in controversy, with disagreements over what parts have obviously been changed by Christian scribes (the manuscripts were preserved by Christians), the fact that both these authors were born after Jesus died (they would thus have probably received this information from Christians), and the oddity that centuries go by before Christian apologists start referencing them.
[–] SayTan 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
He's a busboy where I cook. He is very much real, albeit sloppy at mopping floors.
[–] Chimaira92 [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
What a joke. No one reads the content and bots are downvoating everything.
[–] jesus_is_lord 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
https://voat.co/v/pics/2279393/11378527
[–] Chimaira92 [S] 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
[–] SayTan 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
On a related note, this is an interesting read: Eric Zuesse. "Christ's Ventriloquists: The Event that Created Christianity"