You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
218

[–] Sylos 2 points 218 points (+220|-2) ago 

For the briefest of moments, you increased the quality of voat.

1
50

[–] Dryad 1 points 50 points (+51|-1) ago  (edited ago)

And now it's over. :(

Edit: to be clear, I was commenting about the lack of a restriction. I'm very much for the original method.

1
2

[–] Vorontsov 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

IS WHAT THE UNDETAKER TOLD JOHN CENA AT THE WWE SUUUUUUPER SLAAAMMM

0
0

[–] poodog 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Still looks pretty good to me!

5
18

[–] IveSeenYouNakid 5 points 18 points (+23|-5) ago 

Molding your comments to get fake internet points, there's something wrong here.

0
4

[–] Sylos 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

It's a danger when you associate anything with a value. By doing so, you trigger pleasure center hits, resulting in a desire for more points. It's why there's the gamification of exercise, etc. Doesn't matter that the points are literally fucking worthless(unless you're a dick scumbag who sells the account), people will try to get more than the other guy, because.

0
0

[–] Pissed-Off-Panda 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

And now he's crap again.

0
0

[–] Chupwn 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Don't stop trying kids, it's for the greater good!