You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
5

[–] 10247094? 2 points 5 points (+7|-2) ago 

The first thing that will happen is the CTR/ShareBlue cunts come back and endlessly post their outright lies, again. If you let those people have fully enabled accounts, you're just asking them to act in concert and upvote each other's posts. (They all work in one office. It's easy for them to organize behind the scenes.)

Upvote manipulation, especially with alt accounts, is going to be limited on the new Voat and it is also a bannable offense. Also lying is not grounds for censorship.

1
11

[–] Crensch 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

The first thing that will happen is the CTR/ShareBlue cunts come back and endlessly post their outright lies, again.

Also lying is not grounds for censorship.

No, but saturating this place with obvious lies, and manufacturing popular support will reduce the amount of real estate for legitimate users. If I have to scroll through 3 paid-for 'opinions' for each decent comment I want to read, it won't be long before I find the juice isn't worth the squeeze.

For every paid-for opinion, the amount of visible real estate for legitimate users shrinks, and it will continue to shrink until the non-paid-for opinions stop showing up, because it's not worth fighting for the small spaces left.

1
1

[–] 10248379? 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

If there are that many paid opinions to block out actual content chances are something is being spammed and those involved will be banned and the content removed. If content isn't being spammed then refute their points, or downvote and move on. Downvoting will still enable us to push undesired content to the bottom and even collapse bad comments. It just won't be the force responsible for getting accounts restricted and then banned.