You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
24

[–] MagicalCentaurBeans 0 points 24 points (+24|-0) ago 

i suspect the cracks will show when whomever is tasked with investigating is swamped with "i didn't do it" refutes.

0
8

[–] Le_Squish 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

How about a new option under user info that shows how many of that person's post have been flagged for spam and how many post have been removed, deleted, etc. with links to said posts?

0
3

[–] heygeorge 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I like the basic idea of this, but with any new system comes a new potential for abuse.

0
3

[–] 10247510? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Depending on how the system is implemented this may not even be necessary.

0
3

[–] Lemongarb 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Maybe have a "council" that reviews the post/comment being refuted. That way it's not just one person.

0
5

[–] 10247209? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

If this is going to replace negative CCP entirely it should be a group of trusted users.

0
0

[–] SotiCoto 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

That would be subject to groupthink and the usual pitfalls of democratic action: i.e. tyranny of the majority. Outliers would be left powerless.

0
1

[–] brandon816 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Keep in mind that this really needs to be done only once per person, very likely that the user always was or never was abusive. Hardly anybody just decides one day to change their ways.