You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
0

[–] Rainy-Day-Dream 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

I think as long as we restrict it's use to active participants of the sub in question it'd be a very nice thing to have

1
3

[–] HarveyKlinger 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

No good. The faggot that's running v/Chicago banned everybody that was posting there (see https://voat.co/v/Chicago/modlog/banned)) so none of us would have been considered "active participants." That cunt (@Clueless-Joe-Jackson) had multiple accounts so when it was taken away from him, he merely took it over with one of his alt accounts (@noobftw) and even bragged about it. Take a good look at all the mods of that sub. They're all the same faggot (which he again admitted to). In case you're curious, I got banned for posting a Chicago Tribune Article about something that happened that weekend on the south side. There was no commentary.

@puttitout: until v/Chicago gets fixed and a system is put in place so that it can be resolved quickly if it ever happens again, @VOAT will always be slightly cucked by SJW's and trolls.

0
5

[–] PuttItOut [S] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

v/Chicago is my case study. You think we aren't going to solve that?

0
0

[–] noobftw 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

AWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW MY PUSSY HURTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I WANT TO BE A RACIST PIECE OF SHIT AND PEOPLE WONt LET ME DEFILE EVERYTHING WITH MY DRIVEL.