You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
27

[–] SuperConductiveRabbi 0 points 27 points (+27|-0) ago 

Pure democracy is easily subverted by factions. We should trust only the admins with the ability to decide whether or not a mod is acting against the interests of his community.

0
12

[–] Tsilent_Tsunami 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Suppose the positive vote result mandated admin investigation and action on the issue instead of a user generated ban outright.

0
10

[–] 10247645? 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

This. I support Voat as a site for FREE speech, not hive-minded echo chamber speech from a single specific ideology that currently makes up the majority of the userbase due to Reddit refugees.

0
0

[–] teatime 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

This is exactly why I'm against any element of human interaction with this spam blocking. I'd rather deal with a little spam than a whole lot of crazy factions pushing people out.

0
0

[–] Rainy-Day-Dream 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

then make it a republic and place restrictions on who can vote in the system

0
3

[–] SuperConductiveRabbi 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Only land-owners, perhaps? Accounts can be bought or transferred, or, more plausibly, SJWs/ShareBlue/other infiltrators (who certainly exist, look at 4chan and Reddit) could just lay low and then fuck things up.