You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] go1dfish 3 points 80 points (+83|-3) ago 

Breitbart might be another option, could use Voat to power the comment section instead of Disqus with a little bit of dev effort.


[–] 9139863? 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago 

Breitbart might not be as interested in ties with Voat as InfoWars, but it is still worth a shot. If we can get enough sponsors from the big media outlets in the New Right, then we can save Voat's finances while also making Voat become more popular.


[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Guess thats the only way to go on the long run.

Eventually shit will start to go South ans Voat will start censor for the sponsor but such is faith of all free internt communities.


[–] 9139051? 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

That would be a fucking stretch to implement, forget 'bout it

On the flip side they might be interested in getting free ad space on voat

That said, if every1 clicked on the fucking ads featured on this site everyday, and voat gets paid by click, we could raise some money

granted, not much, it's not as if we were millions here, more like thousands


[–] The_Duke_of_Dabs 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

You can leave the 'a' in there. It's a soft pronunciation of the entirety of the 3 words, fuh (soft and quick) GET (This is where you bounce up in the whole of the phrase) aboutit (said like it's one word itself and trailing). fuhGETaboutit

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 



[–] gauss_markov 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Why would they lose advertisers? Voat is too small to be featured in the news. For all intents and purposes, we're a Reddit clone with laxer moderation.