You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

8
251

[–] 9138620 8 points 251 points (+259|-8) ago  (edited ago)

@PuttItOut

Ask for an infowars sponsorship, in exchange we get to see alex jones face everyday

on a fucking banner right there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

3
107

[–] Moosh_Banger 3 points 107 points (+110|-3) ago 

That is actually not a bad idea.

0
56

[–] cyks 0 points 56 points (+56|-0) ago 

Machina complex ultra b-86 vitamins. Neolithic pheromone inducing, machina complex ultra b-86 vitamins will ensure your offspring have the highest differentials in their DNA. Get postnatally woke, get machina complex ultra b-86 vitamins.

0
26

[–] MetalAegis 0 points 26 points (+26|-0) ago 

Love me some super male vitality.

0
11

[–] ShitArchon 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Yeah, I don't care how "unsavory" the ads are as long as it means the site is funded instead of "bawww! Woe is me, we're going to close the site!" posts. It's like how when YouTube demonetized videos, I wanted the ads back so we wouldn't have to pay to fund the creation of content we want like MisterMetokur videos.

0
5

[–] HarveyHarveyJones 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

That's opinionated man

3
80

[–] go1dfish 3 points 80 points (+83|-3) ago 

Breitbart might be another option, could use Voat to power the comment section instead of Disqus with a little bit of dev effort.

0
22

[–] 9139863 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago 

Breitbart might not be as interested in ties with Voat as InfoWars, but it is still worth a shot. If we can get enough sponsors from the big media outlets in the New Right, then we can save Voat's finances while also making Voat become more popular.

0
14

[–] 9139051 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

That would be a fucking stretch to implement, forget 'bout it

On the flip side they might be interested in getting free ad space on voat

That said, if every1 clicked on the fucking ads featured on this site everyday, and voat gets paid by click, we could raise some money

granted, not much, it's not as if we were millions here, more like thousands

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

1
28

[–] markrod420 1 points 28 points (+29|-1) ago 

if you think infowars won't try to manipulate the content like any other advertiser then you are just lying to yourself about who they are.

0
37

[–] 9141525 0 points 37 points (+37|-0) ago 

I'd rather have InfoWars trying to manipulate this site to believe in more conspiracies than to have some normie trying to silence the conspiracy talk entirely.

0
7

[–] 9139070 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Well they can still try

0
6

[–] TheIrieOne 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I don't have a twitter but suggest everyone who does ask inforwars or their sponsers.