You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

4
18

[–] 8005161? 4 points 18 points (+22|-4) ago 

My worthless interpretation would be looking at someone's profile and downvoting everything in sight because you were triggered. (i.e. being a faggot).

[–] [deleted] 1 points 22 points (+23|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

2
9

[–] SuperConductiveRabbi 2 points 9 points (+11|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Especially since I tag users, and thus I'm more likely to vote on them, as they stand out (both upvotes and downvotes).

1
3

[–] 8005267? 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago  (edited ago)

/u/probablynotafaggot described it perfectly. What's not to get?

1
3

[–] Scrapco 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Ehh, I don't know. I've had comments that people didn't like, and they've downvoted a user page's worth of comments. I don't think that should be bannable though, it's just dumb. There's already a 10 per day restriction, no? Guess not!

So is it brigading if more than one person gets triggered by that comment and downvotes a bunch? That's happened too. Not sure I'm in favor of that either. But how do you tell the difference between that and people communicating to each other, "hey, this guy's a tool, let's wreck his imaginary points?"

Putt knows! :-D Guess we'll find out soon enough.

1
3

[–] greycloud 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago  (edited ago)

no, there is not a 10 down vote restriction per day. it is dependent on how many ccp you have. i can down vote about 5,000 4000 times a day.

12
-8

[–] SaneGoatiSwear 12 points -8 points (+4|-12) ago 

ABSOLUTELY NOT. THERE IS A 7 DAY DV RESTRICTION. YOU CAN DV A PERSON AS MUCH AS YOU WANT.

VOTING ON A SOCNET IS PROTECTED FREE SPEECH. ANY ABRIDGING OF THAT SPEECH IS UNACCEPTABLE.