You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

12
-11

[–] SaneGoatiSwear 12 points -11 points (+1|-12) ago 

Fyi, I read voat's code on git, and there ABSOLUTELY IS A READ ONLY MODE. But it leaves a bad taste in people's mouths. They now have that; see how putt said he's doing update in sandbox naow. ok you say something a lil different. you're completely ignoring the fact that for years, voat always had community discussion about big changes, and atko and putt would acquiese to what the community wanted. now we're not even allowed to know in advance?

#TheseAren'tOurDevs

0
7

[–] PuttItOut [S] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

ReadOnly mode is for updates and maintenance and is fully transparent to users. It is also a site setting and can not target individual users.

7
-6

[–] SaneGoatiSwear 7 points -6 points (+1|-7) ago 

you aren't supposed to be talking to me, justin.

please re-start pretending not to talk to me.

jk


are you going to end voat censorship and remove -ccp restrictions?

are you going to further restrict all users to stop a few?

are you going to add anti-bot tech to voat?

why are the users no longer allowed to have conversations about voat changes at all??

[–] [deleted] 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

8
-7

[–] SaneGoatiSwear 8 points -7 points (+1|-8) ago 

uh, close,

the going theory is that conde nast did a hostile takeover of voat, inc.

so in theory, they're not competitors, just two subsidiaries of the same parent corp.

do you know who you're talking to?

i spend more time on voat than anyone else.

and you think i don't know voat, inc, is a corporation registered in delaware?

lol

play dumb

openly posts googlecanceraids links

shill detected. capping logging and archiving for possible shill.