You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
6

[–] 7589220? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

So long as it's only to protect other voaters, this rule is entirely fair and I will back it 100%.

0
1

[–] 7589681? 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

This. As long as what Voaters are doing isn't illegal, the rest of the Net can go fuck itself. Take care of our own house, and the rest of the internet can do the same. Reddit trying to play Savior of the Interwebz is part of the reason for their decline.

0
0

[–] 7624659? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

What happens if someone gets doxxed and then it's later discovered they're a Voater? If they get doxxed (or threatened with doxxing) and create an account to shield themselves?

0
0

[–] 7629893? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

We can only control what happens on this website. That means the only way this rule can work is doxxing accounts is banned. Tying a real person to an account the other way around would still be the same thing. If you're thinking of a news article, we can't control news. I've never seen "Steve Jobs, otherwise known as 420_blaze_it_xxxxx___ on reddit," on a news story.

0
0

[–] 7598522? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Ditto.

0
0

[–] 7596069? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Do we not assume many who are the unhappy subjects of Voat users' investigatory or editorial subverses are not also Voat users lurking here? If true, might it be important to clarify such a rule to allow publicly available info to be Voat published?