You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

18
14

[–] 7584561? 18 points 14 points (+32|-18) ago 

It is still sexualizing children which should not be aloud in any shape or form. If any general area of the genitals are shown it should be banned.

2
13

[–] 7585986? 2 points 13 points (+15|-2) ago 

Sexualizing sure, but posting a picture of my daughter in a Halloween outfit isn't. Seems unfair to ban posting pictures of kids entirely, but there's certainly something that needs defined there.

0
3

[–] 7591043? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

No nude minors. If you must take it one step farther then say no minors in underwear. However, sometimes underwear is hard to distinguish between a bikini.

Edit: Drawings of sexualized minors is legal in most of the US. Thus, it should be allowed on Voat.

[–] [deleted] 5 points 10 points (+15|-5) ago 

[Deleted]

2
6

[–] 7585446? 2 points 6 points (+8|-2) ago 

Lose respect? Dude, there are users here who clearly think black people are sub-human. What respect? We never had respect.

0
6

[–] 7585243? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

What do you think about jailbait? Aka non nude teens? It`s banned on 4chan but allowed on 8ch.

0
4

[–] 7587315? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

That's some reddit talk there. We have to ban it for the image of the site!!

That is censorship. At the very least your motives qualify as censorship.

Let's use that logic elsewhere. /v/pizzagate makes us look like loons, so for the image of the site.. /v/politics could use some improvements. Works per your argument. It's a non-argument. The image comes second after freedom.

1
3

[–] 7585389? 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

The fastest way to lose the respect of people who would join our cause.

/v/niggers is a quick way as well

3
10

[–] 7584623? 3 points 10 points (+13|-3) ago 

Yes, I would agree, at least as far as VOAT is concerned.

0
6

[–] 7584911? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

You mean covered or uncovered, or both?

1
1

[–] 7585419? 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

He means if its uncovered, even if its supposedly innocent or 'art', it should be removed. If it is uncovered, but barely so, it should probably be removed.