You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
-2

[–] 7561763 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Did the v/Chicago mod create that subverse?

0
3

[–] 7561890 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

That doesn't matter here, mods do not own subs they curate them, they are spam janitors and nothing else.

0
0

[–] 7562045 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Would you rather have 70% of something or 100% of nothing. Clearly the admins don't want to get too involved and have always been reluctant to demod in nonsystem subs. So a rule of thumb mandating mod removal when the mod becomes abusive and didn't create the subverse has a logic that they can't argue with.

0
0

[–] 7562706 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I don't believe so. It's existed for a while and the mod has only been a member for about 2 days.

0
1

[–] 7562778 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Then the mod of v/chicago should be removed when @HenryCorp is stripped of v/gunsarecool and v/niggers is given back to its community. @PuttItOut

0
0

[–] 7563853 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The mod of v/chicago (@Clueless-Joe-Jackson) has been a member for 1.9 years, and did create v/chicago.

You might be confusing v/chicago, and it's owner @Clueless-Joe-Jackson with v/CHlCAGO, and the owners of that sub who are (@CIueIess-Joe-Jackson, @CIueless-Joe-Jackson ).