This subverse is for news from all around the world.
Be sure to check out /v/news as well!
Related Subverses:
/v/WarFollowing - Sub for all things relating to combat, terrorism, battle or war related news, stories, videos, etc. Also contains content related to dealing with war in daily life.
/v/USNews - For U.S.-central news
/v/WorldNews2 - Our less-moderated anything-goes subverse
Rules & Guidelines
[0] Removed
[1] Please report rule violations instead of debating them in the comments.
[2] News must not be older than fourteen days at the time of submission.
[3] User-editorialized titles are subject to deletion. State only the facts, not opinions or speculation.
[4] No spam, advertisements or ref-links.
[5] Removed
[6] Use correct capitalization in titles (i.e. no caps lock).
[7] Link the desktop version of an article, not its mobile version, and if you can search for an archive and link to that on https://archive.is/
[8] This should go without saying, but this is an English-language subverse. Posts and comments in other languages may be removed.
The spirit of these rules is to foster a community where dissent, free thought and open discussions are encouraged. All moderation activity should operate within this spirit.
Please do not post links in other subverses pointing to specific submissions or comments here. Cite the source directly if you are interested in the content.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] DickHertz ago
I disagree. If you choose to renounce your citizenship the country should not treat you as just another foreign national. You should be banned from ever holding US citizenship again since you have made your choice and it should be permanent.
[–] HoneyNutStallmans [S] ago
Seems like an arbitrary reason to not be treated equally.
[–] DickHertz 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
If you choose to abandon your country you shouldn't be equal to foreign citizens because you have rejected your citizenship and it doesn't make sense to allow people to switch off when it's not favorable to them then back on when it is. That seems reasonable at least to me. Why would we as a group want someone back under those conditions?