0
18

[–] Spaceballs-1 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

He's right.

2
1

[–] Subtenko 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

1
15

[–] go1dfish 1 points 15 points (+16|-1) ago 

None of that should matter, even if he admits to doing the strike it's not our responsibility to intervene.

0
4

[–] BigFatDaddy 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Shit.

I hate when I agree with you.

3
-2

[–] jerry 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

It matters because gas bombs are a violation of human rights and geneva conventions. Thats why we intervene

0
6

[–] sacofpotatoes 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Oh its our responsibility to enforce international law?

0
4

[–] windsse 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

It could have been chlorine. Rebels/islamists/isis/alq/whatever took control of a water plant that had a stock of chlorine gas canisters used to purify water and they've been using them in attacks.

0
2

[–] 1True_Morty 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Still terrible.

Read the accounts of Entente commanders watching their troops die in chlorine gas clouds in WW1. It's horrific.

3
3

[–] AmaleksHairyAss 3 points 3 points (+6|-3) ago 

This part:

They should be effected right away.

Isn't necessarily true. It depends on how much sarin was used, how long it's been, and other environmental factors. It's possible -- if unlikely -- that brave first responders didn't have the necessary equipment but rushed in anyway and were fine. It's also possible they received very low doses of sarin and were effected. I've seen references to "dust masks" worn by first responders, by the way, and that certainly is not a dust mask.

0
13

[–] Drunkenmoba 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

Having been trained to deal with Sarin gas. A single drop of it in liquid form on the hood of a car creates enough lethal dose for thousands of people in a 100 yard radius.

Let that sink in.

4
-4

1
11

[–] smifft 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago  (edited ago)

It's also possible that the white helmets are a CIA funded Al Queda terrorist cell that specializes in false flags.

1
0

[–] verifex 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Oh hello, I too get all my most credible stories from Russia Insider. Totally the best place for the most neutral news to learn about world events. Please keep reading Russia Insider, it is good news outlet that gives best truth available.

0
1

[–] intrepiddemise 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

If you're trying to say that it's a propaganda piece by an outlet that is literally owned by the Kremlin, then you're absolutely right, and you should be suspicious of it.

2
-1

[–] HarlandKornfeld14 [S] 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

I like Russia Insider and judging by this being on the front page most people here also appreciated the post.

Totally the best place for the most neutral news to learn about world events.

Neutrality is dead, everyone has an agenda, or is pushing one without knowing it.

Please keep reading Russia Insider, it is good news outlet that gives best truth available.

I will keep reading it, I read it every day and try to share the articles I enjoyed with the Voat community.

0
0

[–] Apathy 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

So he browses the internet.

3
-1

[–] Shoggoth 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago  (edited ago)

This guy lost credibility by adding the video of the dead lady supposedly opening her eyes. The camera was shooting from a point above her head in the first half and below in the second. With how open her eyes were, they would have appeared closed from the camera's position in the first half, despite having not moved. I can't say she was dead and I can't say she was alive, but if he can't understand how perspective works he's a moron.

ETA: You guys realize that using that as an example will make people more likely to cast aside the verifiable hoaxes (of which there are many involving the whitehats), yes?