You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
For example, trolling posts like veggie posts (potato/turnip/tomato posts) meant to forum slide and disrupt as seen on posts such as http://archive.is/lwx2X, http://archive.is/sZLWo, and http://archive.li/xUlVv. These posts are not posted with the spirit of the sub in mind and aim to disrupt the subs.
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
[–]Gorillion0 points
12 points
12 points
(+12|-0)
ago
But the problem is that if you centralize it, "legitimize it" in the mainstream sense and give it a source of funding, it immediately makes it vulnerable to manipulation. It has to be an anonymous network of morally and ideologically driven individuals or it won't work. It's defense lays in it's anonymity. It's the most important factor. Assange got his shit pushed in because he was the single public face associated with Wikileaks.
But he's right about "deserves". It deserves it, but it won't get it without destroying everything that makes it effective.
Kim Dotcom on Twitter: ".@Wikileaks deserves to be well-funded, well-staffed & well-defended. In the age of biased media and fake news Wikileaks is a beacon of hope"
[–]8671310?2 points
-2 points
0 points
(+0|-2)
ago
Wikileaks earned back some of my trust since the October fiasco. But it brings even more questions to me and i post this in hope someone smarter and more informed will reply. Did Julian stage the whole "im being kidnapped, help pls" thing so he can escape the Ecuadorian place (sorry i cant remember i just had my tooth pulled out and i am high af)? I read a lot since October about whats happening, i saw some pics posted by wikileaks that some now claim they are fake (ex. two armed guys in a black van). Can someone inform me please? Kim Dotcom said, at the time, that Julian is ok and we should stop worrying. If thats the truth, why did they take them so long to post PoL? Why did they attack their own fans and accuse them of causing trouble to Julian's mother (trying to shame people to stop the questions).
Pls no shill replies.
Sort: Top
[–] Gorillion 0 points 12 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago
But the problem is that if you centralize it, "legitimize it" in the mainstream sense and give it a source of funding, it immediately makes it vulnerable to manipulation. It has to be an anonymous network of morally and ideologically driven individuals or it won't work. It's defense lays in it's anonymity. It's the most important factor. Assange got his shit pushed in because he was the single public face associated with Wikileaks.
But he's right about "deserves". It deserves it, but it won't get it without destroying everything that makes it effective.
[–] derram 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
https://archive.is/yfQCS :
This has been an automated message.
[–] AOU 3 points -1 points 2 points (+2|-3) ago
For this useless mayo dumpster, Wikileaks is a bacon of hope.
[–] 8671310? 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
Wikileaks earned back some of my trust since the October fiasco. But it brings even more questions to me and i post this in hope someone smarter and more informed will reply. Did Julian stage the whole "im being kidnapped, help pls" thing so he can escape the Ecuadorian place (sorry i cant remember i just had my tooth pulled out and i am high af)? I read a lot since October about whats happening, i saw some pics posted by wikileaks that some now claim they are fake (ex. two armed guys in a black van). Can someone inform me please? Kim Dotcom said, at the time, that Julian is ok and we should stop worrying. If thats the truth, why did they take them so long to post PoL? Why did they attack their own fans and accuse them of causing trouble to Julian's mother (trying to shame people to stop the questions). Pls no shill replies.