Just speaking militarily, allowing those Syrians to reach Europe was a huge mistake. From a humanitarian perspective, sure there were thousands of innocent people whose homes had been destroyed and they just wanted to survive. However, once you start a war, you don't have the luxury of humanitarianism.
You can't let the enemy in. And if there's a chance the enemy is mixed in a group of people, you can't let that group in. Even if there were no terrorists in that flood of humanity, terrorists would start to appear among them after living in poverty in Europe for a few years. Places like the Calais jungle do nothing but radicalize them.
Every single general in every single army was well aware of the realities of allowing an enemy inside your borders, and yet still this flood reached Europe. Europe just allowed itself to be overwhelmed.
The chinks and the Ruskies are laughing their asses off right now.
Sort: Top
[–] onemealperday ago
America opened its borders wide open too due to the 1965 immigration act. America cucked itself even before Europe did.
[–] lestermacgurdy [S] ago
this is different. this is opening the borders to an enemy that they were currently at war with. If Europe would have prevented the Syrians from migrating into Europe, they would have migrated to neighboring nations in the middle east. Opening a path from the middle east to europe for tens of thousands of refugees was an act of warfare by someone and failure to block it off was an act of treason by someone else.