This is voat so many of you already know where I'm going with my point. Sure, you think the media is our enemy. You may think muslims are our enemy. And some may think the state is our enemy. And some may even think we are our own enemy. I fall in the latter category.
The people completely devoid of reality have no fucking clue what I am even talking about. For them, I am a tin foil hat wearing nut. They voted for Hilary and believe the United States myth told by teachers and the media. They cover their ears if I try to shatter their illusions. To them, I am the problem. They swallowed the blue pill.
The "moderates" are confused. They think I am crazy and want to believe the myth. They wander around voat or alternative media and wonder if any of the alternative narratives are correct. If any of the alternative narratives are true, they have to prepare themselves for cognitive dissonance. Not a pleasant place to be. They see the red pill and are afraid to swallow it.
For you dear moderate, I'm going to present you with some ideas. I'll cut the red pill into tiny pieces so the effect isn't overwhelming.
The media is not our enemy any more than a bullet is our enemy. It's a powerful weapon for sure. It disseminates ideas very efficiently like an atom bomb. So when you hear people blaming the media or CNN for fake news. Think instead that CNN is like a MOAB. The difference is CNN doesn't kill. You can protect yourself and families from the blast. CNN's blast radius is enormously wide but easy to escape once you know how.
Muslims are dangerous and want to kill us, yet they aren't our enemy any more than CNN is. They are a proxy army brought here by us. The US government fights this way: rather than fighting a sovereign country directly, they hire mercenaries and supply them with weapons and training. That way the US has plausible deniability and can pretend to its citizens we aren't at war. Selling war is hard today. It must be done indirectly. Consider this, if muslims were the enemy, we'd ban them. They are like weeds, they spread quickly but are easy to control before they take over the dirt. But we do not, we welcome them. Protecting you and your family from the violence of muslims is intentionally difficult. I will comment more about this further on.
The state is more dangerous than muslims. You can't see it. It's an idea. We submit to it. Because it's abstract, there is nothing to protect yourself from. Sure, you can blow up state buildings. All that does is give short term satisfaction. The state is made up of a cacophony of ideologues. Their weapons are ideas. Their army is us. Yes, an abstract entity is our enemy and it uses us as its army.
Yes, the red pill is very bitter. Take some sugar, it will taste better. I tried to chop it up, but there are a few large pieces to swallow.
Earlier I said we are the enemy. Yes! The state uses us against us. Very effectively too. Below is a recent example.
"ISIS claims responsibility for Manchester concert bombing but gives no evidence" reads CNN headline. Notice the idea here? The state wants to diminish the idea muslims did this. Otherwise the citizenry would want the state to stop allowing muslims in. All the articles refer to the "innocent children". No, the muslim attackers are not attacking innocent children. They see all non muslims as infidels who need to be killed. Children or adults makes no difference. The weaponized media must frame the violence this way in order to prevent people from noticing the war in their face. They cloak reality by changing the way you interpret the war. It's not a war, it's someone (we don't know who) simply doing something abhorrent.
To combat this violence and cancer only takes waking people up, that this is a full fledged war. World war three has no tanks, planes and marching soldiers. That is a fictional account of a war. The real war is staring you in the face. You are reading it. This post is part of the war.
So how are you going to react?