Posted by: 13Buddha
Posting time: 5 months ago on 7/22/2020 2:23:19 AM
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 10/20/2020 10:00:00 AM
Views: 206
SCP: 6
6 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
~3 user(s) here now
Post anything that truly makes you say WTF?!
Rules and Guidelines
WTF submissions must be link post.
Don't spam or link to your website.
Don't post content containing politics or activism.
Don't post memes, comics or captioned images.
Please label NSFW content.
Submissions must be WTF-worthy.
Links to Voat are not allowed.
If you see someone breaking the rules or would like to make a suggestion, please message the moderators.
NSFW: No Authorized: No Anon: No Private: No Type: Default
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Content or User violates User Agreement
Hi, it looks like you're new. Welcome to Voat!
Voat is a censorship-free community platform where content is submitted, organized, moderated and voted on (ranked) by the users.
Archived On Google, enter any 3 digit #'s (4 #'s has worked as well) followed by the word "cases." Apologies for my stupidity if there's a logical explanation. (WTF)
submitted 5 months ago by 13Buddha
view the rest of the comments →
[–] AbeFroman66 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 5 months ago (edited 5 months ago)
Well, I think a logical explanation might be that google is pulling from every set of data from every global location since the beginning.
With the over saturation of media coverage, there is a good chance that almost every number has been used once somewhere.
Also, I did plug in a bunch of random numbers and found that "1220 cases" does not bring up a Kung Flu count anywhere on the front page...yet.
edit: There is a Corona count on the second page, though.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] AbeFroman66 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Well, I think a logical explanation might be that google is pulling from every set of data from every global location since the beginning.
With the over saturation of media coverage, there is a good chance that almost every number has been used once somewhere.
Also, I did plug in a bunch of random numbers and found that "1220 cases" does not bring up a Kung Flu count anywhere on the front page...yet.
edit: There is a Corona count on the second page, though.