0
6

[–] Jasoman 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

atk0 has said before he will leave everything that is legal in his country will be allowed on this site even if he personally disagrees with the content.

0
1

[–] bigfuckindealman [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

and that's commendable, because like i said, free expression is extremly valuable, but this is inherently dangerous. Anyway, I was just floating an idea.

1
1

[–] Jasoman 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

if you really want to help get it out of here downvoat instead of blocking, but i don't practice this I just give it as a option.

0
4

[–] oftotc 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

What you are doing in this post is what I would call 'concern trolling', even though it's blurry whether this is your actual intent. You left reddit, but you still sound exactly like an SJW black-ops account.

If you are concerned about the victimization of children, there are ways you can combat it without infringing on the freedom of expression of others. It really is that proverbial "slippery-slope" when you choose to silence categories of thought that you think are bad. Now, you might go back to reddit, or wherever, and report that voat is cool with sexualizing children because someone defends subs like that. But that's not really true. I guess we'll see what you do next. eh?

0
1

[–] bigfuckindealman [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I wouldn't say its blurry, like I said i'm new to the community, and by my own admission I don't entirely understand how the community works. To my delight it seems like most of us (and I include myself) are only interested in a tolerant space to engage in discussions about any number of subjects. As you say, and I agree censorship is a slippery slope, and as i've said i believe that free expression is great because it allows for discussion. Slightly off the subject but this website has been the least aggressive open forum type website i've ever seen. I acknowlege that I feel the way I do about this subject because I am a parent. As I said before I was just floating an idea. surely you don't fault me for that? Also I never suggested that the existence of a few subverses dictates the behavior of every user here. That's oversimplifying the argument I was making.

0
3

[–] oftotc 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

As I said before I was just floating an idea. surely you don't fault me for that?

Hopefully you've noticed that the goats actually discussed with you, instead of downvoating, ignoring, or ridiculing you. It is encouraging that you espouse anti-censorship ideals, but then you use words like "tolerant space". You can find "intolerant" easily enough on voat, as elsewhere. But, for the record - I'm keeping an eye on you ;-)

0
3

[–] FullyBespokedTomato 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I do not believe that I can change Voat, nor would I want to. But surely we can do something about this.

You're stepping on your tongue there a bit, no?

0
1

[–] bigfuckindealman [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

a bit sure, I would agree with that.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

1
0

[–] bigfuckindealman [S] 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

ok, if say, you were into that sort of thing, and started looking for it, someone has to make it. So if your age group preference was say 3-7 and you identified as a heterosexual active pedophile you would obviously be interested in observing an adult male engage in a sexual act with a female child of that age. If you couldn't find what you were looking for you'd ask a likeminded person for it, and if they have it they might share it or sell it or produce it for sale or for free, which in turn results in the rape of a child aged 3-7.

[–] [deleted] 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

1
0

[–] ToFat2Fish 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Fuck off faggot, go back to Reddit if you want censorship voat doesn't want or need pussys like you.

0
1

[–] bigfuckindealman [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

nah, i like it here. But thanks for the suggestion.

1
0

[–] ToFat2Fish 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

That's what I would expect a faggot like you to say

1
0

[–] Vvswiftvv17 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

I agree with you OP and don't for a second let these faggots make you feel bad for posting it. Also don't let them talk you out of believing child trafficking and pedophylia isn't a big issue or money maker, because it is. You are dead right with your points. These fuckers arguing with you are the subscribers to this bullshit. They are sick twisted fucks. Don't apologize.

800,000 people are trafficked across international boarders every year.

Of 800,000, 50 % are children

The Un estimates 1M children are sexually exploided each year

It is estimated between 100k and 300k children are being sold in the U.S. alone.

I agree @atko needs to do more. As a parent of a toddler it turns my stomach that these sick fucks are given a platform.

0
3

[–] oftotc 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

These fuckers arguing with you are the subscribers to this bullshit.

Not true.

0
1

[–] bigfuckindealman [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I appreciate you saying so. I wasn't apologizing, just trying to get a feel for the subject, as well as voicing a concern. I however have to disagree with your assertion that they are subscribers to those subverses. I thought they might be at first, but after checking their profiles not a one of them (at least on those accounts) are subscribed to the subverses in question. Rather they (like me) are only interested in allowing for freedom of expression. and while I don't agree with what some people say, i do concede that they have a right to say it, even if it's distasteful. However, I do agree with you that allowing these subverses is equally slippery. As I said in an earlier reply, if you don't censor something, how far should you be willing to let it go.

1
0

[–] Vvswiftvv17 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Abusing a child is no where near freedom of expression.