You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

6
40

[–] Conspirologist 6 points 40 points (+46|-6) ago 

If this is a free speech site, there is no need for private subverses, unless they are perverted degenerates.

5
34

[–] AmazingAutist 5 points 34 points (+39|-5) ago  (edited ago)

This. Must be an idea by the (((new investor))).

4
21

[–] Conspirologist 4 points 21 points (+25|-4) ago 

Yes, of course. Changes started to happen right after the (((investor))).

2
1

[–] fuckmyreddit 2 points 1 point (+3|-2) ago 

It was fun while it lasted.

0
15

[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

I've used private (secret) groups on facebook for a variety of regular things, like organising events that you don't want the whole world to see or internal organisation for clubs.

That said, I think you're right. Allowing people to have private forums on voat would not end well.

0
10

[–] weezkitty 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Facebook is like the opposite of Voat though

4
-2

[–] Crensch 4 points -2 points (+2|-4) ago 

Explain to me how this is functionally any different than an aesthetic change to private messages.