Welcome to TwoXChromosomes, a subverse for thoughtful content - serious or silly - related to the women and womanly things.
Voat's TwoXChromosomes is not a "safe space." Safe spaces, although they have their place, are often used to shut down conversations and to create a false sense of superiority. They enable people to remain ignorant.
This is, instead, a place for discussion and debate about all things female and female related. To shy away from debate does everyone a disservice. Therefore /v/TwoXChromosomes is a place where adults can converse in a respectable and mature manner.
Disagreeable comments should be taken care of by the voting system. Mod intervention will be light. Banning is an extreme option used only in rare circumstance.
For the philosophy behind the sub please visit:
https://voat.co/v/TwoXChromosomes/comments/248589
Other female oriented subs on voat include:
/v/askwomen
/v/feminism
/v/feminisms
/v/GirlsRock
/v/women
view the rest of the comments →
[–] GirlOnTheInternet ago
Here the author thinks she has identified the problem: meaningless sex doesn't satisfy a woman (or men for that matter). Her solution: teach men and women (and girls and boys in school) about, what she calls, "pleasure-centric" sex. Which sounds like total bullshit-nonsense terminology. (Side note: we don't need a cutsey, psuedo-scientific phrase for goddamn everything.)
The REAL solution: when a chick meets a dude she says something along the lines of, "Hey, I'm not into casual sex. Turns out I'm female and look for something more substantial in terms of relationships. Huh. Biology is weird. Does that sound like something you'd be interested in?"
But, you know, then we'd have to depend on women being in touch with their own innate needs and logically explaining said needs to potential mates.