You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] FlashVirus ago 

which constitution did you read are you retarded? it's literally the opposite

You have no idea what you're talking about. Hancock (a man I much admire, mind you) created the Constitution to have severe checks & balances in the government which obviously would prevent one ideological system from implementing drastic reforms on the entire country. The Alt-Right, if it ever does get off the ground, would have to make extremely slow incremental changes that would take close to a century to really become whole. I mean look at the Progressive movement of the early 20th century, you had a series of Progressive Republicans and Democrats trying their hardest to make changes to the nation and and it took a good bulk of the 20th century to do so. FDR, despite him being characterized as a radical, only moved America slightly towards the Left economically. After his reign America still remained a solidly capitalist country to this day. As I said in my prior post- look at past movement that had ideological connections to contemporary Alt-Righters. Guys like the Nativists and 2nd Klan. What became of them? How much did they change? America's history seems to be 'radical' movement after radical movement trying to make as much change as possible and eventually making rather minor nudges either to the Left or Right.

I'm not sure if you're a shill or just some sort of sad defeatist but what you're presenting me with are some of the weakest blackpills I've encountered in a while, there's obviously no need to despair or give up.

I've advocated neither, I have no idea where you got that from. I was critiquing the Constitution and the American government-- not saying "fuck it, let's give up." My ideal scenario would be for us to remain politically, socially, economically active whilst separating ourselves (PLE/Amish style) from society in some manner.

0
0

[–] Rainy-Day-Dream [S] ago 

checks and balances ON THE STATE, if the people of america become "radical" and elect representatives to the 2 and by extendtion 3 branches of government it can be as radical as the people of this country want. The problem currently is a bunch of idiots are trying to make us a democracy instead of a republic as is proper, far too many people in this country have voting rights notable the young, women, and noncitizens considering the enforcement situation. Also yeah political change is slow but there's always drastic measures and we don't need nearly as many people for that given how small a percentage of the population fought in either the revolution or the civil war

ah gotcha but they won't let us unfortunately, I don't have the reading material on hand but people have tried to set up far right cities, as well as libertarian ones but they faced arson and sabotage everytime