You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
4

[–] 8704292? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

So, first, you were on about the alleged 300 deaths from a single attack in Mosul. When that turned out to be bullshit, you made it about the years long campaign altogether.

Goal posts: moved.

0
0

[–] p0ssum ago 

Not moving a thing, I can quote the three hundred dead as well:

As of Wednesday, they had removed 278 bodies, many of them children, and it was unclear how many more were buried beneath the rubble, said Civil Defense Lt. Col. Taha Ali.

Does that make you feel better? 278 is approximately 300, but you know, go tell all your friends about how you handled that libshit.

0
2

[–] 8704417? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

And Baghdad Bob said they only removed 61. So why exactly is Baghdad Taha more trustworthy than Baghdad Bob?

Your source is shit, it's full of conflicting reports, and you know it. The one consistent thing in that article is that the strike was allegedly performed by "U.S. led coalition forces". Let me clue you in on how coalitions work: they are not hierarchies. The generals talk and coordinate about a lot of things but not everything. It could have been any one of the countries who had a presence in the country, and you're jumping to the conclusion it was a US strike, because it makes you feel cool and edgy.