You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 18118370? [S] ago  (edited ago)

Alright, I'll play along. A cursory glance of your comment history reveals one of the examples. Compare the top level comment in the following submission:

NOTRE DAME Chief Architect Says This Was No Accident by belliferous in GreatAwakening | [–]VicariousJambi 1 points (+1|-0) 1.8 days ago | Alright, thanks will do!"

0
0

[–] 18118702? ago 

posts sitting at the top of /all

That is not a post sitting at the top of v/all, thats a comment.

And you think they're a shill for, what, having an opinion that the fire was started by the government instead? What an absolute shocker that would be if thats what really happened.

Try harder.

0
0

[–] 18119129? [S] ago  (edited ago)

No thanks. Not interested in having my emotions primed by arguing. If you guys aren't doing this on purpose, you're being pawns.

Shilling is a dance, not a straight line. There's a give and take involved. I might let you lead with the first step, such as your top-level submission, but then I'll push or pull us towards point Z with my own top-level comment. Etc.

As I said, I'm not going to spend the day ruminating on this problem. I can't solve the degeneration of this forum within this one anon submission. It is a dance.

If you're not doing this on purpose, then you're letting the shills lead the dance. Think about what you post and the effect that it's logical conclusion will have. Do you want to spend you day ruminating about shit you can't do anything about? Or do you want to have a cool perspective to focus on what you do have control over?

I won't be your symbolic crucifixion, today, o Vampire.