1
4

[–] Del_Taco 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Ideal land for the new colonists.

5
2

[–] Iamdandy [S] 5 points 2 points (+7|-5) ago 

Thanks for the support @insanity_wolf , @LardOn4Bacon and @bfriend13 . Thanks for your support towards my contributions.

4
-1

[–] Pattoe 4 points -1 points (+3|-4) ago 

Without contributions Voat is nothing. Definitely appreciate it. Try to comment more too :)

1
1

[–] ToFat2Fish 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Wow good read thanks. To think we have the ability to cause such lasting destruction in such a short time with limited technology. Consider the impact of a ww3 with nukes. To quote Albert Einstein: "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

[–] [deleted] 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

1
4

[–] clamhurt_legbeard 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Certain areas have so much arsenic 99% of plants die. It sounds worse than the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.

War can have worse consequences than nuclear meltdown....

1
1

[–] itchywateryfarts 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

I wonder at what point it wouldnt matter. Like the Half-Life had gotten to a point of such decay its not dangerous anymore.

1
0

[–] Del_Taco 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Perhaps some of the explosives will decay if they're exposed to the elements. I don't think the war gases will decay, though. If the container in the shell wasn't ruptured on impact, you can count on getting some nasty gas if it breaks open.

18
-12