...it has to be. I'm surprised I never considered this until now.
For most entry-level redpillers, first thing you learn is 13% of the population (niggers) commits over 50% of all violent crime.
Then at some point, you learn it's more like 5-7%, specifically 18-30 year old nigger bucks that commit over 50% of all violent crime.
But that 50% comes from official records. With officially confirmed suspooks, aperests, coonvictions and other data.
Not all crimes are reported. Crimes don't even always generate a police report. Hell, even outstanding suspects go "unconfirmed." How many times have we seen CCTV footage of some nigger jacking an old lady, never getting caught and the police bulletin we see is just "MALE, UNKNOWN AGE, UNKNOWN RACE, WEARING DARK CLOTHING"?
And then there's our kiked court systems. How many cases get dropped? How many are reduced? I've personally seen cases of armed robbery beaten down to just trespassing (and therefore non-violent guys!) and the nigger goes off with a slap on the wrist.
So that problematic 5-7% -- what percentage of violent crime are they really responsible for? My guess is at least 80%, which is a mind-boggling number, but one I think is wholly realistic (and accurate).
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Doglegwarrior 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
You are probably right. I got a misdemanor assualt. The judge said this in a 60% hispanic town. He asked why we were even in court. He said there are 100 of these type assualts a day. I didnt think about it till now, that 100 in my town is easily 85 to 90% black or hispanic. My lawyerd response was that my client (aka me) felt he did nothing wrong it was self defense and that he works with non profits and charities and didnt want an assault charge to affect his work. Jury of sheeple found me guilty. Later when my lawyer got to question jurors to old guys said that the way the judge wrote up the charges they felt they had to find me guilty. Total bullshit