...it has to be. I'm surprised I never considered this until now.
For most entry-level redpillers, first thing you learn is 13% of the population (niggers) commits over 50% of all violent crime.
Then at some point, you learn it's more like 5-7%, specifically 18-30 year old nigger bucks that commit over 50% of all violent crime.
But that 50% comes from official records. With officially confirmed suspooks, aperests, coonvictions and other data.
Not all crimes are reported. Crimes don't even always generate a police report. Hell, even outstanding suspects go "unconfirmed." How many times have we seen CCTV footage of some nigger jacking an old lady, never getting caught and the police bulletin we see is just "MALE, UNKNOWN AGE, UNKNOWN RACE, WEARING DARK CLOTHING"?
And then there's our kiked court systems. How many cases get dropped? How many are reduced? I've personally seen cases of armed robbery beaten down to just trespassing (and therefore non-violent guys!) and the nigger goes off with a slap on the wrist.
So that problematic 5-7% -- what percentage of violent crime are they really responsible for? My guess is at least 80%, which is a mind-boggling number, but one I think is wholly realistic (and accurate).
view the rest of the comments →
[–] WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
You know all those small scale burglaries that cops never pursue or make an arrest on, things like vehicle break-ins, stolen bicycles, garage burglaries, or house break-ins where the only things taken are cash, jewelry, prescription drugs, air jordans, and small electronics.... guess who commits those?
Instead of saying "18-30" you might as well just say "30 and younger" because some of them vet started young.
[–] Splooge [S] 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
There have been documented instances of gang sprogs as young as 10 years old, carrying firearms and taking "hits" against rival niggers.
[–] RustyEquipment ago
But are this classified in violent crimes? They can be but not always
[–] WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
No youre right. I must have skimmed past that word in the op