/v/Showerthoughts is a subverse for you to share all those thoughts, ideas, or philosophical questions that race through your head while in the shower.
"Showerthought" is a loose term that applies to any thought you might have while carrying out a routine task like showering, driving, or daydreaming.
Please be respectful of others' submissions. If you disagree, explain why in the comments. Downvoats are reserved for submissions you don't like or comments that do not add to the discussion, not opinions with which you disagree.
RULES
-
Please refrain from shower "observations;" we've heard them all before
-
Ideas for Voat features should be posted in /v/ideasforvoat, even if you think of them while in the shower
The spirit of this subverse's rules is to foster a community where dissent, free thought, and open discussion are tolerated, limited only to trolling, excessive abuse, site-breaking rules, or content that is better suited for another subverse. All moderation activity should operate within this spirit.
Moderation oversight: Deleted posts, Deleted comments, Banned users
view the rest of the comments →
[–] JanMichaelVincent ago (edited ago)
Why kill them at all, then? In fact, why put them in camps when they would contribute a lot more to the economy as autonomous workers?
It's almost as if, there was a war on, and he was trying to maintain stability by putting potential dissidents in one place.
[–] 7533680? ago
Read my other replies.
Their was no plan to kill them. It happened because that's were things ended up.
The other guy is claiming the camps were Disneyland. How good they had it. Give me a break, they were forced labour camps were you died if you couldn't work. That was not the initial plan but that's what happened as the war went on.
[–] Was_This_Name_Taken 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
If there was no plan to kill them, how come there were extermination and death camps besides consideration camps, let alone how many "undesirables" died?