Cheerio From London 🇬🇧
https://youtu.be/RKJ1DL2PGFU?t=769 at 12:50
I notice there is an interdiction on "death deniers" in the Sub rules, but Jason is saying what many people are thinking - including myself. And he has an interesting take on the making of an offer that someone can't refuse. With the example of Eric Braverman.
The Rod Wheeler evidence analysis technique: Door No 1 Nice life, plenty of money, work for Eric Schmidt at Google - Door No 2 blow the whistle on the Clinton Foundation and we'll discredit you and bankrupt you - Door No 3 bullet in the head and a deep hole.
What would you choose? Maybe the parents were not in on his disappearance at first and still aren't. Perhaps the brother knew from the getgo. Who knows?
But the chatter has been about the Clinton Foundation, its bad hombres and worse deeds.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Pizzalawyer 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
I don't understand the logic here. Just because the authorities and Seth's parents do not want to disclose the death certificate, the autopsy report, or the contents of the body cams is not irrefutable proof that Seth is alive. It is equally plausible that the failure to release such evidence is because the authorities want to hide the details of his death and shooting because it points to a hit job on behalf of a contender for the US presidency. Without more evidence we are in a state of equipoise and cannot proceed further in any direction. Truthseekers are trapped until someone with knowledge comes forward to break thru the barrier.