Cheerio From London 🇬🇧
https://youtu.be/RKJ1DL2PGFU?t=769 at 12:50
I notice there is an interdiction on "death deniers" in the Sub rules, but Jason is saying what many people are thinking - including myself. And he has an interesting take on the making of an offer that someone can't refuse. With the example of Eric Braverman.
The Rod Wheeler evidence analysis technique: Door No 1 Nice life, plenty of money, work for Eric Schmidt at Google - Door No 2 blow the whistle on the Clinton Foundation and we'll discredit you and bankrupt you - Door No 3 bullet in the head and a deep hole.
What would you choose? Maybe the parents were not in on his disappearance at first and still aren't. Perhaps the brother knew from the getgo. Who knows?
But the chatter has been about the Clinton Foundation, its bad hombres and worse deeds.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Silverlining [S] ago (edited ago)
Botched robbery and shooting would pass if Seth had not been implicated in the DNC leak by Wikileaks. There seems to be some legal impediment to public release of a death certificate - though fake birth certificates have been provided before now - so that might not serve.
Then we have Rod Wheeler claiming his investigation was blocked at the doors of the DNC and by the family [who presumably have and could release a death certificate].
If there was a shooting, there would be bullets - either on the sidewalk or in Seth. If they were removed from the body, there would be some kind of report, even if not a full autopsy.
The whole situation is unsatisfactory - especially if he is dead. Many people don't trust the Government or the police. Why don't they just open up and try to tell the truth?