2
50

[–] chags 2 points 50 points (+52|-2) ago 

I believe that the big mistake everybody is making is treat this as a personal issue. I couldn't care less about who is who, who is a SJW or a hater or troll or whatever. These subjects are more fit to subversedrama. IMO, if you want serious discussion, forget about all of this. The point is: deleting posts in a default sub because the lack of a character was correct?

5
18

[–] Novius 5 points 18 points (+23|-5) ago  (edited ago)

I can prove the "The only people sick of "political correctness" are those who get pissed off because someone tells you not to use bigoted slurs and sexist speech." comment

this discussion was shut down by she and seems to attract start of the down votes

as to the general accusation of "?" deletions, here

I don't know if this is worthy of the response she recieved but there it is.

2
9

[–] chags 2 points 9 points (+11|-2) ago 

As i said, this is about the user, and I think it's irrelevant. People can think as they want to, downvotes and upvotes will occur, so what? I don't see this discussion going anywhere, because it became personnel drama.

29
-20

9
-5

18
-6

[–] [deleted] 8 points 26 points (+34|-8) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
9

[–] kevdude 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

"stand up for the users against the minority self privileged mods."

I started v/modthemods as a place where we can compile examples of mod abuse.

[–] [deleted] 6 points 24 points (+30|-6) ago 

[Deleted]

20
-12

25
-14

6
21

[–] gatordontplaythatsht 6 points 21 points (+27|-6) ago  (edited ago)

Now I'm a troll? Jesus this is one hell of an effort to label people considering you have taken certain facts and just smothered the whole thing with your opinion.

Call me wrong if you'd like, but troll? That really under mines the efforts I've been making to help voat.

13
-7

6
20

[–] Crensch 6 points 20 points (+26|-6) ago 

Notably absent:

The deletion for "soapboxing" that wasn't against the rules.

The fact that rule 1 wasn't actually clear English, and could have easily not been about the actual question mark.

13
-9

18
-11

2
18

[–] neonneophyte 2 points 18 points (+20|-2) ago 

All I am really seeing here is that she and her handful of cronies refuse to accept why the community is upset, their culpability in the matter and a serious effort to rewrite the narrative. Pretty much what I would expect.

You act in the best interest of the community, not YOUR interest or these are the results. End of story.

3
10

[–] kevdude 3 points 10 points (+13|-3) ago 

If they were to act in the best interest of the community, u/she would step down.

12
-11

2
17

[–] mr_skeltal 2 points 17 points (+19|-2) ago 

The modlog for this thread is interesting. Seems like a lot of dissenting opinions are being removed, plus @Scandinavian was banned. The collusion here between a clique of users is ridiculously apparent.

2
6

[–] Crensch 2 points 6 points (+8|-2) ago 

Yeah, just got another comment removed. No word as to where the rhyme or reason is to this, except it seems to be mostly against the people wanting moderators to be the janitors they're supposed to be, instead of tyrants.

1
8

[–] kevdude 1 points 8 points (+9|-1) ago 

Wait, what? They are removing comments now? Can you go over to v/modthemods and create a thread and paste the comments they removed?

7
-4

9
-6

[–] [deleted] 2 points 15 points (+17|-2) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

5
5

[–] neonneophyte 5 points 5 points (+10|-5) ago 

For "witch hunting" when you are directly responding to a supposition in "SeriousDiscussion." The topic, is a user. You didn't bring it up, you responded to it. This is even more blatant than what @She was up to.

This is not going to go well.

12
-12
load more comments ▼ (14 remaining)