0
6

[–] gazillions 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

They have no shame. Fortunately for them, their reader base is stupid enough to believe that article.p

0
4

[–] Aged 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Go to hell Buzzfeed.

0
3

[–] maltespier 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

love the arrogance of buzzfeed writers - they think they are influential while lecturing you like a 5 year old because they're self appointed Internet Media Experts. All that article achieved was me following SavedYouAClick

0
1

[–] ZenAtheist 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

BuzzFeed can go suck some transgender dick.

0
1

[–] Gorillion 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Click Baiting not working anymore, huh? It's almost like the goy know...

0
0

[–] Uncle_Slob 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Taken at face value, it's less than meaningless—it's self-negating. It's obscurantist, senselessly treating journalism as if the high modernist values of contingency and complexity were journalism's own. It's moralistic, proposing a false binary between stories that serve the public interest and those cynically presented just because people will read them. It's suspicious, hostile, and patronizing. It confuses decorum with integrity.

Can anyone explain his "stance"? Am I retarded or did this not make any sense? (could be both, but still...)