Views: 841
SCP: 155
158 upvotes, 3 downvotes (98% upvoted it)
~91 user(s) here now
Subverse anonymized: usernames are hidden and votes don't count.
NSFW: Yes
Authorized: No
Anon: Yes
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 26790841? 0 points 13 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago
Kind of. Like you can't unwind a murder, a rape or a war. But you can punish for it. And you can make the punishment so severe that others will be deterred from doing it again.
These people need to be punished in the most severe fashion. I mean public convictions, public executions and using RICO to seize every last nickel they have as the presumed fruits of their criminal enterprise. The Soros family, and the Clintons and the Obamas and the Bidens and the Kerrys, etc, etc, etc, need to go down in the worst humiliation, and their children and grandchildren need to grow up penniless and in shame.
And all the illicit moves they made need to be rooted out challenged as morally indefensible until those moves are effectively offset or reversed on those grounds.
[–] 26791098? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I politely disagree, maybe you can recite the full quote and by whom: any law that is unconstitutional at its conception and although put into action, is still unconstitutional, and any effects of said law are unconstitutional.
Perhaps you will put it far better than I butchered it here.
[–] 26791225? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Look, I can't say for sure my take is correct. But I can't see how the government can even administrate the problems associated with invalidating everything Obama did as president. Think about every single bill he signed into law, every budget, every promotion, appointment, treaty ... I would love it but it would be a nightmare to unwind every single act.
[–] 26794419? ago
Yes, you're talking Marbury v. Madison, correct?