When you write code, you have to compile it. Here is an easily readable if statement in C:
If ( trump_count > biden_count)
{
trump_count --;
biden_count++;
}
That says if trump has more than biden, then subtract 1 from Trump and add 1 to Biden.
That is an oversimplified example but there would have to be something along those lines in the Smartmatic/Dominion code. So we should be able to get that off of the machines right? Wrong. Machines don't read code like that. That kind of code is compiled so that when it gets on the machine it is all just 1's and 0's and the program called the compiler creates that code and it is generally unreadable.
https://files.catbox.moe/ahpcx1.png
If we knew what the compiler they used was then we could decompile the code and have our smoking gun right there in the code. However, I think they thought that through and created their own compiler so that if the code and compiler are subpoenad, they can hand over a compiler that was designed in a way to obfuscate the offending code.
If you think writing your own compiler is hard, guess again. You just need to know how the CPU works and how storage and memory are addressed. Even that crazy bastard that wrote TempleOS wrote his own compiler.
I cannot believe we aren't dissecting the code forensically, and if someone is, that would be the absolute best way to prove this, beyond statistical analysis, eyewitness testimony, etc.
Happy Thanksgiving.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 26557734? ago (edited ago)
Q wasn't posting some software tool kit for shits and grins. He was making a statement to them, but they ignored it and tried the cheat anyway. They had nothing to lose, and Q already knew they would try anyway since Q knew they had nothing to lose.
It's not if the white hats have the code. They have it, and they have worked it backwards and forwards. They know all the back doors, and holes were it is being manipulated.